INDICADORES MÚLTIPLOS DE SUSTENTABILIDADE: BARREIRAS, MOTIVADORES E DESAFIOS PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO HUMANO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18696/reunir.v7i1.492Palavras-chave:
Indicadores múltiplos, sustentabilidade, barreiras, motivadoresResumo
Com o crescente número de indicadores que são elaborados e publicados, há uma força sobre eles que definem quais sobrevivem, ou seja, a seleção natural dos indicadores. Desta forma, o objetivo deste estudo é realizar uma revisão sistemática da literatura, para identificar quais são as barreiras aos indicadores múltiplos de sustentabilidade, bem como seus motivadores e desafios. Observou-se que a falta de acordo persiste em um importante debate científico sobre as dimensões da sustentabilidade. Apesar da falta de consenso, julga-se importante cada estudo definir as dimensões da sustentabilidade conforme seu contexto, o que é corroborado pela diversidade de áreas que podem envolver a construção de indicadores múltiplos de sustentabilidade. Destaca-se como barreiras, as institucionais, políticas e a complexidade dos fenômenos que envolvem a sustentabilidade. Entretanto, como motivadores os indicadores auxiliam na implementação de políticas sustentáveis e melhoram a gestão pública para o desenvolvimento humano. O grande desafio dos indicadores múltiplos de sustentabilidade é ser adaptado ao nível local e evitar a sua subjetividade.
Downloads
Referências
BHANOT, Disha; BAPAT, Varadraj. Sustainability index of micro finance institutions (MFIs) and contributory factors. International Journal of Social Economics, v. 42, n. 4, 2015, pp. 387-403.
BILBAO-UBILLOS, Javier. Another approach to measuring human development: The composite dynamic Human Development Index. Social Indicators Research, v. 111, n. 2, 2013, pp. 473-484.
BIOLCHINI, Jorge et al. Systematic review in software engineering. System Engineering and Computer Science Department COPPE/UFRJ, Technical Report ES, v. 679, n. 05, 2005, p. 45.
BÖHRINGER, Christoph; JOCHEM, Patrick EP. Measuring the immeasurable—A survey of sustainability indices. Ecological economics, v. 63, n. 1, 2007, pp. 1-8.
BRANDI, Humberto S.; DARODA, R. J.; OLINTO, A. C. The use of the Canberra metrics to aggregate metrics to sustainability. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, v. 16, n. 5, 2014, pp. 911-920.
BRERETON, Pearl et al. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of systems and software, v. 80, n. 4, 2007, pp. 571-583.
CABEZAS, Heriberto et al. Sustainability: ecological, social, economic, technological, and systems perspectives. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, v. 5, n. 3-4, 2003, pp. 167-180.
DESAI, Meghnad. Human development: concepts and measurement. European Economic Review, v. 35, n. 2, 1991, pp. 350-357.
DISTASO, Alba. Well-being and/or quality of life in EU countries through a multidimensional index of sustainability. Ecological Economics, v. 64, n. 1, 2007, pp. 163-180.
ELKINGTON, John. Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California management review, v. 36, n. 2, 1994, pp. 90-100.
GALLEGO-AYALA, Jordi; GOMEZ-LIMON, J. A.; ARRIAZA, M. Irrigation water pricing instruments: A sustainability assessment. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, v. 9, n. 4, 2011, pp. 981-999.
GALLEGO-AYALA, Jordi; JUÍZO, Dinis. Performance evaluation of River Basin Organizations to implement integrated water resources management using composite indexes. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, v. 50, 2012, pp. 205-216.
GÓMEZ-SAL, Antonio; BELMONTES, Juan Alfonso; NICOLAU, José Manuel. Assessing landscape values: A proposal for a multidimensional conceptual model. Ecological Modelling, v. 168, n. 3, 2003, pp. 319–341.
IDDRISU, Insah; BHATTACHARYYA, Subhes C. Sustainable Energy Development Index: A multi-dimensional indicator for measuring sustainable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 50, 2015, pp. 513-530.
KATES, Robert W. et al. Sustainability Science. Science, v. 292, n. 5517, 2001, pp. 641-642.
KITCHENHAM, Barbara et al. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering-A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, v. 52, n. 8, 2010, pp. 792–805.
LABUSCHAGNE, Carin; BRENT, Alan C.; ERCK, Ron P.G. van. Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 13, n. 4, 2005, pp. 373–385.
MARIANO, Enzo Barberio; SOBREIRO, Vinicius Amorim; REBELATTO, Daisy Aparecida Nascimento. Human development and data envelopment analysis: A structured literature review. Omega, v. 54, 2015, pp. 33–49.
MAYER, Audrey L. Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environment international, v. 34, n. 2, 2008, pp. 277-291.
MERKLE, Andrea; KAUPENJOHANN, Martin. Derivation of ecosystemic effect indicators—method. Ecological Modelling, v. 130, n. 1, 2000, pp. 39-46.
MILLER, Harvey J.; WITLOX, Frank; TRIBBY, Calvin P. Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for transportation planning: a measurement framework. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 26, 2013, pp. 51-64.
MOFFATT, Ian. A preliminary analysis of composite indicators of sustainable development. The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, v. 15, n. 2, 2008, pp. 81-87.
MORSE, Stephen. Stirring the pot. Influence of changes in methodology of the Human Development Index on reporting by the press. Ecological Indicators, v. 45, 2014, pp. 245-254.
NEUMAYER, E. The human development index and sustainability—a constructive proposal. Ecological Economics, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 101-114, 2001.
NIJKAMP, Peter; VREEKER, Ron. Sustainability assessment of development scenarios: methodology and application to Thailand. Ecological Economics, v. 33, n. 1, 2000, pp. 7-27.
NOURRY, Myriam. Measuring sustainable development: Some empirical evidence for France from eight alternative indicators. Ecological economics, v. 67, n. 3, 2008, pp. 441-456.
OECD. Towards sustainable development: environmental indicators. Publications de l'OCDE, 1998.
PULLIN, Andrew S.; STEWART, Gavin B. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, v. 20, n. 6, 2006, pp. 1647–1656.
REPETTI, Alexandre; DESTHIEUX, Gilles. A Relational Indicatorset Model for urban land-use planning and management: Methodological approach and application in two case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 77, n. 1, 2006, pp. 196-215.
RONCHI, E.; FEDERICO, A.; MUSMECI, F. A system oriented integrated indicator for sustainable development in Italy. Ecological Indicators, v. 2, n. 1, 2002, pp. 197-210.
SAGAR, Ambuj D.; NAJAM, Adil. The human development index: a critical review. Ecological economics, v. 25, n. 3, 1998, pp. 249-264.
SALVATI, Luca; CARLUCCI, Margherita. A composite index of sustainable development at the local scale: Italy as a case study. Ecological Indicators, v. 43, pp. 162-171, 2014.
SEN, Amartya. Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks, 2001.
SEN, Amartya. The idea of justice. Harvard University Press, 2011.
SHARMA, Tarun; BALACHANDRA, P. Benchmarking sustainability of Indian electricity system: An indicator approach. Applied Energy, v. 142, 2015, pp. 206-220.
SIKDAR, Subhas K. On aggregating multiple indicators into a single metric for sustainability. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, v. 11, n. 2, 2009, pp. 157–161.
SMEETS, Edith et al. Environmental indicators: Typology and overview. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 1999.
UNDP. Human Development Report 1990: Concept and Measurement of human development. 1990
WCED. Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, 1987.
ZHOU, Peng; ANG, B. W. Indicators for assessing sustainability performance. In: Handbook of performability engineering. Springer London, 2008. pp. 905-918.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Declaração de Direito Autoral
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de ser um periódico de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais, com caráter científico.
A Revista REUNIR adota Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-Uso não-comercial 3.0 Brasil License ou seu equivalente.