português
a importância da prova de conceito em projetos com robôs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18696/reunir.v14i3.1759Keywords:
Gerenciamento de projetos, Prova de conceito, RobóticaAbstract
A implementação de projetos com robôs não apenas possibilita a execução de tarefas industriais perigosas, repetitivas ou fisicamente exigentes, mas também reduz o risco de lesões para os trabalhadores, promovendo a saúde e segurança no trabalho. Este estudo surge em resposta à crescente demanda global por tecnologias inovadoras, no caso, a implementação de robôs, que traz para o gerenciamento de projetos desafios significativos. O objetivo da pesquisa é analisar como a prova de conceito influencia a implementação de projetos com robôs. Para tanto, por meio da abordagem qualitativa, foi realizado um estudo de caso, tendo a coleta de dados ocorrida por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas e análise de documentos. A implementação de um Laboratório de Prova de Conceito demonstrou resultados positivos para a empresa estudada, como a mitigação de riscos, o aumento da confiança dos stakeholders, a melhoria na especificação de projetos, o melhor desempenho final e a redução no tempo de venda. Este estudo contribui para o conhecimento científico ao mitigar riscos em projetos de tecnologias inovadoras da Indústria 4.0 e reforçar a confiança das partes interessadas.
Downloads
References
Akinlolu, M., Haupt, T. C., Edwards, D. J., & Simpeh, F. (2022). A bibliometric review of the status and emerging research trends in construction safety management technologies. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(14), 2699-2711. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1819584
Albats, E., Podmetina, D., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2021). Open innovation in SMEs: A process view towards business model innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(6), 2519-2560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1913595
Albertin, M. R., Elienesio, M. L. B., Aires, A. D. S., Pontes, H. L. J., & Aragão Junior, D. P. (2017). Principais inovações tecnológicas da indústria 4.0 e suas aplicações e implicações na manufatura. Anais do XXVI Simpósio de Engenharia de Produção: Contribuições Da Engenharia De Produção Para Uma Economia de Baixo Carbono (pp.1-13). Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil, 8-10 novembro. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/60805
Anh, T. T., Tan, N. T., Le, D. T., Hieu, L. C., Mahmud, J., Latif, M. J. A., & Quang, N. H. (2023). Digital twins of robotic systems: increasing capability for industrial applications. In Nguyen, T.D.L., Lu, J. (eds), Machine Learning and Mechanics Based Soft Computing Applications (pp. 241-258). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6450-3_23
Bajic, B., Suzic, N., Moraca, S., Stefanović, M., Jovicic, M., & Rikalovic, A. (2023). Edge computing data optimization for smart quality management: industry 5.0 perspective. Sustainability, 15(7), 6032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076032
Bhattacharya, S., & Chatterjee, A. (2022). Digital project driven supply chains: a new paradigm. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 27(2), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2020-0641
Bhattacharya, S., & Momaya, K. S. (2021). Actionable strategy framework for digital transformation in AECO industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(5), 1397-1422. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2020-0587
Ben Hlima, I., Kacem, H., & Gharsallah, A. (2023). Efficient implementation of low cost and secure framework with firmware updates. IET Computers & Digital Techniques, 17(3-4), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1049/cdt2.12054
Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(4), 439-468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp008
Burgard, W., Cremers, A. B., Fox, D., Hähnel, D., Lakemeyer, G., Schulz, D., ... & Thrun, S. (1999). Experiences with an interactive museum tour-guide robot. Artificial Intelligence, 114(1-2), 3-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(99)00070-3
Cartwright, M., Cohen, S., Fleishaker, J., Madani, S., McLeod, J., Musser, B., & Williams, S. (2010). Proof of Concept: A PhRMA Position Paper With Recommendations for Best Practice. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 87 (3), 278-285. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2009.286
Carvalho, M. M. de, & Rabechini Junior, R. (2014). Impact of risk management on project performance: the importance of soft skills. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.919423
Cole, R. E., & Matsumiya, T. (2008). When the pursuit of quality risks innovation. The TQM Journal, 20(2), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730810857363
Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business Press.
Choi, T. M., Kumar, S., Yue, X., & Chan, H. L. (2022). Disruptive technologies and operations management in the Industry 4.0 era and beyond. Production and Operations Management, 31(1), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13622
Cugno, M., Castagnoli, R., & Büchi, G. (2021). Openness to Industry 4.0 and performance: The impact of barriers and incentives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120756
Cummings, J., Feldman, H. H., & Scheltens, P. (2019). The “rights” of precision drug development for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer's research & therapy, 11(76), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0529-5
Das, B. (2001). Ergonomics considerations and management action in the implementation of industrial robots. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 11(3), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.1014
Dixit, V., & Verma, P. (2022). Identification, assessment, and quantification of new risks for Logistics 4.0. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 27, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2022.2100331
Dobrucali, E., Demirkesen, S., Sadikoglu, E., Zhang, C., & Damci, A. (2022). Investigating the impact of emerging technologies on construction safety performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(3), 1322-1347. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2022-0668
Dvir, D., Raz, T., & Shenhar, A. J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00012-1
Eskerod, P., & Larsen, T. (2018). Advancing project stakeholder analysis by the concept ‘shadows of the context’. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.003
Floyd, I. R., Jones, M. C., Rathi, D., & Twidale, M. B. (2007, January). Web mash-ups and patchwork prototyping: User-driven technological innovation with web 2.0 and open source software. In 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07) (pp. 86-96). IEEE.
https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.612
Fragapane, G., Ivanov, D., Peron, M., Sgarbossa, F., & Strandhagen, J. O. (2022). Increasing flexibility and productivity in Industry 4.0 production networks with autonomous mobile robots and smart intralogistics. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1-2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03526-7
Garms, F., Jansen, C., Schmitz, C., Hallerstede, S., & Tschiesner, A. (2019, 13 de setembro). Como capturar valor em escala na manufatura discreta com a Indústria 4.0. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/industrials-and-electronics/our-insights/capturing-value-at-scale-in-discrete-manufacturing-with-industry-4-0/pt-br
Hall, D. M., Whyte, J. K., & Lessing, J. (2020). Mirror-breaking strategies to enable digital manufacturing in Silicon Valley construction firms: a comparative case study. Construction management and economics, 38(4), 322-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1656814
Hidalgo, C. A. (2021). Economic complexity theory and applications. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(2), 92-113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00275-1
Insper. (2022, 22 de fevereiro). Número de robôs em operação nas fábricas no mundo triplica em dez anos. Insper. Recuperado de https://www.insper.edu.br/noticias/numero-de-robos-em-operacao-nas-fabricas-no-mundo-triplica-em-dez-anos/
International Federation of Robotics. (15 de julho de 2023). IFR International Federation of Robotics. https://ifr.org/standardisation
Islam, M. S., & Rahman, M. A. (2013). Design and fabrication of line follower robot. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 2(2), 127-132.
https://publicationslist.org/data/ajase/ref-44/52_2_Template.pdf
Kanski, L., & Pizon, J. (2023). The impact of selected components of industry 4.0 on project management. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100336
Kendig, C. E. (2016). What is proof of concept research and how does it generate epistemic and ethical categories for future scientific practice?. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(3), 735-753.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9654-0
Klein, F., Wilmot, A., Tejada, V., Rodríguez, B., Requena, I., Busch, S., Rondepierre, A., Auzeeri, T., Sauerwald, T., Andrews, W., Rihan, H., Fuller, M. e Stoelen, M. (2019). Plataforma robótica modular de prova de conceito para colheita de couve-flor. Agricultura de precisão '19. 783-789. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-888-9_97
Kumar, M. S., Gorshy, H., & Abdelgadir, A. K. (2017). Barriers of Industry 4.0 Implementation in Developing Economy: A MICMAC Analysis. Journal of Computing Technologies, 6(10) 1-4. http://jctjournals.com/Oct_2017/V1.pdf
Kumar, P., Bhamu, J., & Sangwan, K. S. (2021). Analysis of Barriers to Industry 4.0 adoption in Manufacturing Organizations: an ISM Approach. Procedia CIRP, 98, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.010
Kupeshova, S. T., Lazanyuk, I. V., & Kareke, G. T. (2019). Risk Management in the Innovation Project. Farabi Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 9-12.
Lima, F. R., & Gomes, R. (2021). Conceitos e tecnologias da Indústria 4.0: uma análise bibliométrica. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 19, e0200023. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v19i0.8658766
Littau, P., Jujagiri, N. J., & Adlbrecht, G. (2010). 25 years of stakeholder theory in project management literature (1984-2009). Project Management Journal, 41(4), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20195
López-Guede, J., Estévez, J., Garmendia, A., & Graña, M. (2018). Making physical proofs of concept of reinforcement learning control in single robot hose transport task complete. Neurocomputing, 271, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.110.
Lunelli, F. B., & Cecconello, I. (2019). Definition and Application of a Maturity Model for Smart Manufacturing, from the perspective of Industry 4.0. Scientia cum Industria, 7(2), 126-134.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18226/23185279.v7iss2p126
Maaradji, A., Hacid, H., & Soukane, A. (2023). From Service Composition to Mashup Editor: A Multiperspective Taxonomy. Future Internet, 15(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15020059
Macedo, M. H. B., & Salgado, E. G. (2015). Gerenciamento de risco aplicado ao desenvolvimento de software. Sistemas & Gestão, 10(1), 158-170. https://doi.org/10.7177/sg.2015.v10.n1.a13
Marion, T. J., & Fixson, S. K. (2021). The transformation of the innovation process: How digital tools are changing work, collaboration, and organizations in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 192-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12547
Martens, C. D. P., Pedron, C. D., & Oliveira, J. C. (2021). Editorial. Diretrizes para elaboração de artigos tecnológicos, artigos aplicados ou relatos técnicos de produção com ênfase profissional. Revista Inovação, Projetos e Tecnologias - 9(2), 143- 147. https://doi.org/10.5585/iptec.v9i2.21117
McKinsey & Company. (29 de julho de 2020). Industry 4.0: Reimagining manufacturing operations after COVID-19. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/industry-40-reimagining-manufacturing-operations-after-covid-19/pt-BR
Meyers, P., Sivakumar, K., & Nakata, C. (1999). Implementation of industrial process innovations: factors, effects, and marketing implications. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(3), 295-311.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1630295
Moeketsi, T. C., & Letaba, T. P. (2022). Leapfrogging pathway for Fourth Industrial Revolution: a case of process innovation within an automotive subsidiary firm. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 33(4), 81-93.
https://dx.doi.org/10.7166/33-4-2684
National Science Foundation (2023). Program solicitation: Accelerating innovation research-technology translation. Directorate for engineering, industrial innovation and partnerships. NSF 16-583. https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/partnerships-innovation-pfi/nsf23-538/solicitation
Nguyen, C., Min, B., Matson, E., Smith, A., Dietz, J., & Kim, D. (2012). Using Mobile Robots to Establish Mobile Wireless Mesh Networks and Increase Network Throughput. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 8 (8). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/614532.
Oesterreich, T. D., & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in industry, 83, 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.00
Oliveira, G. F., & Rabechini Jr, R. (2019). Stakeholder management influence on trust in a project: A quantitative study. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.11.001
Papadonikolaki, E., Krystallis, I., & Morgan, B. (2022). Digital technologies in built environment projects: review and future directions. Project Management Journal, 53(5), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211070225
Passarelli, M., Landi, G. C., Cariola, A., & Sciarelli, M. (2020). Open innovation in the new context of proof of concepts: evidence from Italy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 735-755.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2020-0052
Patanakul, P. & Shenhar, A. J. (2012). What Project Strategy Really Is: The Fundamental Building Block in Strategic Project Management. Project Management Journal, 43(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20282
Pinto, J. K., Slevin, D. P., & English, B. (2009). Trust in projects: An empirical assessment of owner/contractor relationships. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6), 638-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.09.010
Project Management Institute (2001). Project Management Book of Knowledge. PMBOK 2000.
Rane, S. B., Potdar, P. R., & Rane, S. (2021). Development of project risk management framework based on industry 4.0 technologies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(5), 1451-1481.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2019-0123
Robla-Gómez, S., Becerra, V. M., Llata, J. R., Gonzalez-Sarabia, E., Torre-Ferrero, C., & Perez-Oria, J. (2017). Working together: A review on safe human-robot collaboration in industrial environments. IEEE Access, 5, 26754-26773. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2773127
Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting, R. C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., & Jozinović, P. (2015). Industry 4.0-potentials for creating smart products: empirical research results. In Abramowicz, W. (eds). Business Information Systems: 18th International Conference, BIS 201. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, (208), Poznań, Poland, June 24-26, 2015, Proceedings (pp. 16-27). Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_2
Silva, M. A. da. (2014). Prova de Conceito (PoC) em Projetos. Project Management Knowledge Base. http://pmkb.com.br/artigo/prova-de-conceitopoc-em-projetos
Soska, G. (1988). Robotic implementation-a four phase systematic approach. Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, 1367-1372 vol.2. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.1988.25236
Stosic, B., Mihic, M., Milutinovic, R., & Isljamovic, S. (2017). Risk identification in product innovation projects: new perspectives and lessons learned. Technology analysis & strategic management, 29(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1210121
Teller, J., & Kock, A. (2013). An empirical investigation on how portfolio risk management influences project portfolio success. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 817-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.012
tom Dieck, M. C., & Jung, T. H. (2017). Value of augmented reality at cultural heritage sites: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(2), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002
Vali-Chivuţa, S., & Angela, E. (2019). Software For Modeling, Simulation And Prototiping RTT Roborts. 2019 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 1-4.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?
Vido, M., Scur, G., Massote, A. A., & Lima, F. (2020). The impact of the collaborative robot on competitive priorities: case study of an automotive supplier. Gestão & Produção, 27 (4), e5358. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X5358-20
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806
Yahya, M., Hui, Y., Yassin, A., Omar, R., Robin, R., & Kasim, N. (2019). The Challenges of the Implementation of Construction Robotics Technologies in the Construction. MATEC Web of Conferences 266(3):05012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926605012
Yap, J. B. H., Skitmore, M., Lam, C. G. Y., Lee, W. P., & Lew, Y. L. (2024). Advanced technologies for enhanced construction safety management: investigating Malaysian perspectives. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(6), 633-642.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2135951
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 REUNIR Revista de Administração Contabilidade e Sustentabilidade
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Declaração de Direito Autoral
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de ser um periódico de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais, com caráter científico.
A Revista REUNIR adota Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-Uso não-comercial 3.0 Brasil License ou seu equivalente.
